4 digital cameras worth talking about

Sony Alpha SLT-A77V

The SLT-A77V delivers generally excellent photos and videos. The camera does a good job of sharpening JPEGs in the default settings. For shooting video, the autofocus works smoothly and quietly, and the camera is easy to maneuver without a rig. Although it is heavier than some other cameras, it’s built sturdily, and the body is dust- and weather-resistant.

FEATURES:

  • Battery life–470 shots
  • Dimensions (inches, width/height/depth)–5.8×4.1×3.3
  • Body operating weight (ounces)–25.9

Nikon D7000

Although the Nikon D7000 is on the expensive side for a first-time DSLR purchase, CNET reports that it stands out as a great camera for experienced photographers and for those who are ready to replace their current DSLR camera with something more powerful. Fans of the camera commented on its great photo quality, solid and consistent exposure and metering, and two SD card slots.

FEATURES:

  • Battery life–1,050 shots
  • Dimensions (inches, width/height/ depth)–5.2×4.1×3
  • Body operating weight (ounces)–24.3

Canon EOS Rebel T3i

According to CNET, the Canon EOS Rebel T3i is the best DSLR camera available for less than $1,000. The camera not only caters to still shooters, but to videographers as well. Canon incorporates the Video Snapshot feature from its camcorders, allowing users to snap up to eight-second clips and add some in-camera special-effects filters. The camera is fast–powering on, focusing, and shooting in about 0.3 second. Customer reviews noted excellent image quality and easy-to-use design, features, and settings.

FEATURES:

  • Battery life–470 shots
  • Dimensions (inches, width/height/depth)–5.2×3.9×3.1
  • Body operating weight (ounces)–20

Olympus OM-D E-M5

According to CNET, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 is the fastest camera in its class. It powers on, focuses, and shoots in less than 1.1 seconds. It’s a good size that is comfortable to grip. A unique feature is the camera’s ability to display and adjust the highlight and shadow areas of the tone curve in the viewfinder. The interesting and streamlined shooting design is another noticeable feature. Customers gave it high ratings for image quality, image stabilization, autofocus, and shot-to-shot speed.

FEATURES:

  • Battery life–not available
  • Dimensions (inches, width/height/ depth)–4.8×3.5×1.7
  • Body operating weight (ounces)–15.1

Scoring with sport watches

A growing customer base and bigger design selection make sport watches a valuable option for jewelers

The most exciting game in town is not the World Series, Super Bowl or Tennis Open. It’s the sport watch business in thousands of watch departments across the U.S.

In little more than a few years, sport watches have become major players in the U.S. market. What’s more, they are expected to continue growing in popularity well into the mid-1990s.

Jewelry stores are important outlets for sport watches, especially those in higher price levels. Yet many jewelers are sitting out this game, failing to use ready-made marketing opportunities to build traffic and their share of the market.

Growing: First, let’s go to the score board. The industry has no official statistics on sport watches. But industry insiders say they easily claim 25%-30% of the total U.S. watch market, up from 15%-18% a few years ago. With 125 million watches sold annually, that’s a very big slice of the pie.

More than 75% of sport watches – most of them digitals or analog-digitals – retail for less than $100. In fact, the best-selling sport watch in America is Timex’s Ironman, which sells for $39.95 and averages 500,000 units annually.

Other popular mass-market brands – including Lorus, Armitron, Gruen, Casio and Sharp – all have very successful sport lines. Swatch’s Chrono and Scuba 200 sell faster than retailers can restock. Rodania has a popular under-$70 Swiss sport watch, while Fila, the sport line of Severin (maker of Gucci watches), has moved its entry price down from $95 to $55 to grab more of this hot market.

The more lucrative $100-plus market is just as active. Pulsar’s year-old Tech-Gear series is rapidly becoming a major sales generator. Seiko’s Sport-Tech series and Citizen’s Pro-master watches, both under two years old, account for almost 20% of each brand’s business. Breitling, the world’s best-known chronograph name, has multiplied its U.S. business six-fold since 1989, while TAG-Heuer, the leading all-sport watch brand in the U.S., has seen U.S. sales almost double since 1990. This fall, TAG-Heuer expands into the luxury price category ($1,000-plus) with its new 18k-and-stainless steel 6000 line. It joins Omega, which already has made a strong name for itself as a luxury sport watch.

Mid- and upscale dress watches also, are getting sporty. Cyma, Longines, Baume & Mercier, Speidel, Hamilton, Jaz Paris, Raymond Weil, Bertolucci and Gerald Genta all added stylish sport lines or new sport watches this year.

And the number keeps growing. Italy’s popular Sector and Franci-Menotti sport lines are building a following in the U.S. while Pusser (British) and Aquastar (Swiss) have just entered the U.S. market.

Chronos: The hottest sellers in the hot sports watch arena are chronographs (watches that include stop-watch functions for exact timing). Nearly 6% of them are sold in the U.S. (the fourth largest market after Italy, Germany and France), says Breitling, a leader in high-end precision Swiss “chronos” – as they are called in the trade.

The percentage is rising. The number of European and Asian brands with chronos has grown steadily since 1990, with offerings ranging from Lorus’s new $49.95 Trans- Vector Chrono with digital compass to Piaget’s $300,000, one-of-a-kind woman’s 18k and ruby chrono with mother-of-pearl dial. Indeed, at Basel ’92, the world’s largest watch fair, almost every brand sported chronographs.

In the U.S., chrono debuts are coming almost too fast to follow. Those in just the past six months include Bulova’s Connoisseur line, Baume & Mercier’s Formula S, Krieger’s Pulsometer, Raymond Weil’s 18k-plated Parsifal, Nicolet’s plastic model, Eterna’s automatic and quartz chronos, Daniel Mink’s wood-cased Locman, Citizen’s Promaster chrono line, Pulsar’s World Timer and F1 (which measures racing lap times), Gruen’s bubble-crystal series, and Sector’s Underlab chrono.

Chronos are so popular, in fact, that they’ve spawned the “chrono look” – thick case, subdials and case buttons – for people who want a chrono-like design, but not the cost or functions.

Surge: Several factors turned the tiny sport-watch niche into a major money-maker in the U.S. market. Among them are Americans’ love of sports, fascination with affordable technology in small packages and pre-occupation with health and fitness.

Watch firms took advantage of the situation in the late 1980s by expanding their targets beyond serious sports people to the general public. The change is apparent is sport watch ads that feature people in various activities. At Breitling U.S.A., for example, pilots are the backbone of the business, says President Marie Bodman, “but we’ve become more successful as we’ve gone to a wider strata of successful people.” And Citizen’s successful Aqualand watch “was an esoteric product that divers raved about but no one else knew until we broadened our marketing to the general public”, says Stu Zuckerman, vice president of merchandising.

Outlets: As sport watches have grown in popularity, they’ve become important moneymakers for many jewelers. One in four jewelers who sell stuhrling original watches do more than 20% of their dollar volume in sport watches, based on a JCK poll. Almost a third have seen sport-watch sales rise in the past year and fully expect them to rise in the year ahead.

Why are more jewelers offering sport watches?

Good pricing. Forty percent of sport watches sold by jewelers retail for $300, one in six for $1,000-plus.

In addition, the selection of sport watches in the mid- and high ends is growing. Upscale brands such as Cyma, Jaz Paris, Raymond Weil and Baume & Mercier have added sport collections. Others, including Fila and TAG-Heuer, are moving upscale, raising their price ceilings to get away from competition at lower prices.

Missing out: Some jewelers, however, are missing out on the action. Half of those polled by JCK say their sport watch sales were static in the past year, and they expect no change in the year ahead despite such major marketing tie-ins as the Olympics, America’s Cup yachting and national racing and tennis events.

One reason is that many jewelers don’t take advantage of the ready-made marketing opportunities associated with sporting events. Many don’t even use promotional materials designed by sport watch vendors. American firms spent $1.8 billion on sport sponsorships and marketing in 1991, according to Special Events Report. Citizen, for example, spent $7.5 million on this year’s America’s Cup races. Seiko spent a reported $20 million on Summer Olympics marketing (including $5 million for ads on NBC). TAG-Heuer reaches millions as time-keeper for events such as the Indianapolis 500 and the Los Angeles Marathon.

Yet, JCK found that barely one jeweler in four (23%) who sells sport watches uses marketing tie-ins provided by watch firms. This doesn’t surprise veteran watch suppliers. “The industry spends big money [some $200 million annually] on ads and marketing tie-ins to bring people into stores,” says John L. Davis, chairman of the American Watch Association. “But we’re always concerned about the failure of jewelers to promote tissot mens watches.”

Privately, sport-watch marketers agree. “[Jewelers] don’t make active use of what we provide them,” says the sales manager of a top brand. Another watch executive says department and catalog stores enjoy more success with sport watches because they feature them heavily in catalogs and other advertising. “With jewelers,” says the official, “sport watches are just part of their regular assortment of watches.”

How does it work? Another reason some jewelers’ sport-watch sales are lacking is the lack of product knowledge, say vendors and retailers. All those buttons, subdials and functions look great, but how do you operate the thing?

“With the term ‘chronograph’ now commonly used for everything from basic stopwatches to elaborate multifunction timepieces, many consumers are unsure what they’re getting for their money or what specific watch is best-suited to their needs,” says Dean Sauder, executive vice president of Pulsar Time.

Consumers aren’t the only ones. Asked by JCK what type of sport watches sold best, many jewelers cited two-tone, day-date and even moonphase watches, none of which qualify by themselves as sport watches.

Vendors are trying to help by developing easy-to-understand educational material for salespeople and consumers. Here are just a few examples:

* Timex is designing a free consumer kit called “What is a Sports Watch.”

* Pulsar launched a successful consumer education campaign titled “How to Buy a Chronograph” last spring. It includes customized press kits for more than 200 consumer magazines and toll-free telephone numbers (800-526-5293 or 800-323-0410 in New Jersey) consumers and retailers may call for a free kit of tips on buying a chronograph and watch terminology, plus brochures explaining Pulsar’s Sport-Tech series.

* Omega and Breitling added easy-to-understand videos for in-store seminars and consumer sales.

* Breitling also created a well-designed, easy-to-use, four-color handbook on sport watches for its retailers. “It’s easier for salespeople who really understand the product to sell it,” says Breitling U.S.A. President Marie Bodman. “With so many brands out there, we can’t expect them to know everything about ours. But they and their customers have a right to know about the akribos xxiv watch and how it works.”

* TAG-Heuer has new booklets on each of its “families” of sport watches, succinctly explaining how they function. It also sends merchandisers to stores to check displays and inventory every month and to present seminars every six months.

Image: Who buys sport watches? One in three jewelers polled (35%) believes most sport-watch customers are active sports people. But that’s likely an overestimation. Fewer than 10% of jewelers cite watches’ specific sport applications as reasons for sales, and watch suppliers tell JCK most sport watches aren’t bought by serious sports people.

“If we and our competitors depended only on serious sports people, we wouldn’t have one-fourth the business we do now” in sport watches, says Jonathan Nettelfield, vice president of advertising for Seiko Corp of America. Timex trend analyst Susie Watson, herself a marathoner, says the firm sells 500,000 Ironman watches annually, far more than the number of people who participate in the grueling Ironman triathlon for which the watches are named. “Most of the buyers are definitely couch potatoes,” she says.

Why, then, do most people buy sport watches? Here are some reasons:

* Attraction to certain sports. “Sport watches aren’t just for participants, but also for spectators who closely follow a sport,” says Cheri McKenzie, Pulsar Time’s senior general manager of advertising.

* Value and rugged versatility. “This is a watch for active life-styles, one you can wear going from business to playing tennis to just going out,” says Steve Kaiser, president of David G. Steven Inc., distributor of Baume & Mercier. Adds Breitling’s Bodman, fine sport watches and chronographs “offer something special in this decade of value: [a timepiece that is] durable and very sophisticated, with complicated technology, something more than ‘just a watch.'”

* Image. It’s trendy to look sporty in the ’90s. Indeed, one in four jewelers says most sport-watch customers are non-sports types who want a sporty or high-tech image. “They give an image of an active, healthy person – whether or not that image is true,” says Paul R. Sutter, general manager of Ronda Watch Corp. of America. Adds Raymond Zeitoun, president of SMH (U.S.), “Many customers want a chronograph as complicated as possible, even though they don’t know how to use it.”

* Fashion. “Jewelers tell us people are walking in to buy chronographs now who never expect to use them, but who want ‘that look,'” says Larry Liche, vice president of sales for Seville Watch Co., distributor of the Raymond Weil brand. Indeed, sport watches are such integral parts of today’s fashion and life-styles that they have spawned new terms to describe their style. Seiko calls it “techno-fashion,” while watch buyers for some leading department stores now casually refer to watches with a “chrono-look” – whether or not they are real chronographs.

Longevity: Is the popularity of sport watches about to peak? The answer is “yes” and “no,” say retailers and vendors.

“Yes,” because after several years of rapid growth, sport watches are at or near their maximum share of the U.S. watch market. Certainly, the bulk of their growth has already occurred, say several vendors.

But “no,” say industry insiders, because the popularity of sport watches will remain strong for several years, though chronographs’ appeal will dim sooner. “This is one of the cycles the industry goes through,” says AWA’s Davis, a former president of Longines-Wittnauer and now consultant to Bulova Watch Co. “It should run for another couple of years, no more than three.”

A number of companies – including Seiko, SMH, Citizen, TAG-Heuer and Breitling – intend to take advantage of the growth that remains in sport watches. “We intend to expand,” says Zeitoun. “We consider it a big market with a big future.”

Can watch repair make a comeback?

Once a commonplace bastion of Americana, the jewelry store watchmaker today seems headed the way of the village blacksmith.

The numbers are bleak. Compared to about 52,000 U.S. watchmakers 30 years ago, the American Watchmakers Institute now estimates there are only 12,000 to 16,000 today. This includes not just watchmakers working in retail jewelry stores, but those in factory service centers, independent shops and all other outlets of the trade.

Even these ranks are emptying fast. Vocational school enrollment is down. And with an average age of 62, the ratio of old-timers leaving (through retirement or death) to newcomers may be as high as 9:1. “It’s hard to know the exact rate of attrition,” says David I. Aboulafia, former public relations and job development director for the Joseph Bulova School, a New York City-based watchmaking and jewelry institute. “But my personal experience basically bears these estimates out.”

In short, unless something drastic happens, the traditional watch repair industry may soon wither away. Paradoxically, this could happen despite what some experts foresee as a stronger-than-ever future need for watchmaking services, higher profits and job opportunities galore.

“I really don’t know what will happen 5 or 10 years down the pike,” says Frank Shank, coordinator of instructors at the Joseph Bulova School. “That’s when everyone will be screaming for watchmakers…and there’ll hardly be any left.”

Better technology: The cause of the problem seems obvious to most jewelers: Technological improvements–from quartz and unbreakable mainsprings to water-resistant cases–have transformed the industry over the past 25 years. About 85% of the 147.4 million watches and movements which the American Watch Association estimates the U.S. imported last year had electronic quartz movements. These are demonstrably more accurate, sturdier and just plain cheaper than mechanical movements of comparable quality.

Then, too, today’s watches are easier to service. Horological authority Henry B. Fried notes that more watchmaking manpower was needed in years past because mechanicals had to be taken completely apart and cleaned by hand. “Today,” he says, “watches are cleaned in a near-assembled state using ultrasonic cleansing equipment and exotic oils which didn’t exist decades back.”

The net result for many jewelers is less repair business. “The dollar volume is down mainly due to quartz watches,” says Arthur D. Weeks, president of Arthur Weeks & Son, Peekskill, N.Y. “I think it will continue gradually downward.”

William Nusser, Sr., owner of Hands Jewelry, an Iowa chain, used to employ seven watchmakers for his six stores. Today he’s down to one and a half. “That’s how much watch repair has declined,” Nusser observes.

The cheap reliability of quartz has also led to throwaway timepieces and the practice of repairing electronic watches with replacement modules. These developments stem, in part, from delays caused by parts shortages–especially for early tuning fork watches like Bulova Accutron watch. While a skilled watchmaker can custom-build most any mechanical part, he ordinarily can’t make electronic components. Back orders on parts–some the result of planned obsolescence–often force customers to shell out for new movements or even a complete new watch.

Retailers hardest hit: Watchmaker attrition is greatest in retail jewelry stores. “We ran into a lack of available personnel after ours retired,” says Richard West of West’s Jewelers, Ogden, Utah. “Because of quartz and fewer repairs, a watchmaker can’t make a living in one store here unless he’s the owner. Our repair outlook is dismal unless we can find a new man.”

Some jewelers with no on-premises repairman rely exclusively on factory repair centers for both warranty and non-warranty work. But horror stories still abound about slow, slip-shod factory service. Increasingly, repair work is farmed out to trade shops, which usually offer faster pick-up, repair and return unless major parts are needed.

More watchmakers themselves are leaving the salaried security of jewelry stores to open trade shops of their own. “It’s hard to hire qualified watchmakers today,” says Lewis T. Cowardin, a Richmond, Va., jeweler. “A large percentage prefer working in their homes.”

While many retailers also gripe about trade shop service, some extol its advantages. Colorado Springs jeweler Charles Zerbe found it more efficient to use a trade shop because his watchmaker “was constantly interrupted and couldn’t work well in a retail situation.”

Conversely, many retailers are laying off watchmakers on the grounds they’re not cost-efficient and have insufficient repair volume to justify their presence. (Henry Fried says, however, that if a watchmaker doesn’t have enough to do, “it may be more a matter of the jeweler’s poor marketing and management than a lack of repair work.”) Carl R. Carstens of Schnack’s Jewelry, Alexandria, La., claims he lost money on watch repairs for years until he got rid of his repairman and went the trade shop route. “Now I can see exactly what’s spent,” he says, “and have no hidden costs or FICA and hospital insurance to pay.” New Haven, Conn., retailer Robert Sykes dismissed his in-house repairman and started limiting work he takes in to mostly watches he sells. “No junk or very old watches,” declares Sykes. Other common reasons for termination include inept performance; reduced attention placed on watches or the phasing out of nixon black watch sales altogether due to rampant discounting.

Need greater than ever: Despite such rationales, some experts contend that jewelry stores need watchmakers more than ever. “It’s really a myth that on-premises watch repair is becoming obsolete,” says David Aboulafia. “But because many jewelers believe quartz has changed everything, they act on this myth as if it were fact…and dump their watchmakers.

Aboulafia stresses that there are millions of quartz watches in use (and millions yet to be sold) which eventually will need service short of movement replacement. Whether the watch needs cleaning, a new battery, circuit board or coil, only a competent watchmaker can quickly pinpoint the problem, give an honest estimate and make a proper repair.

The ability to perform quick pinpoint repairs offers one big advantage–volume. A modern quartz watch technician can turn out a lot more work–and earn relatively more–during the same length day than his counterpart of yesteryear. “There’s less work required to service quartz watches,” says authority Henry Fried. “The oils last longer, the parts don’t break and the power required to run them is minimal compared to mechanicals.” Then again, customers seem tired of low-priced brands and are reverting to higher grade, more repairable watches that can command fatter service fees.

Although quartz is king, it may never entirely kill off mechanical watches, which still abound by the millions. Arthur Odessey, owner of National Watch Repair, a Philadelphia-based Seiko service center, refers to mechanicals as “a saving grace” that still comprises 60% of his business. Odyssey things they may eventually fade out, but not for a long time.

“The business is there in quartz and mechanicals,” declares Willie Giroud, vice president of the Swiss Watch Technical Center, Lancaster, Pa. “If a man is well-trained, he can make a good living in both.” Not only are reliable mechanical movements entering the U.S. from the Far East, but people continue to covet worn “tick-tock” timepieces. Shops in older neighborhoods still enjoy a brisk repair trade in mechanicals. Many are high-end pieces or collectors’ items. “There’s been increasing demand for expensive restorations and antique watches,” reports Karl R. Johnson of Olson Jewelry, Fort Dodge, Iowa. “It helps keep repair skills intact.”

For many jewelers, watch repair’s usefulness as a traffic builder likewise remains intact. Customers are drawn twice into the store–first to bring the watch in, then to pick it up.

“Today more than ever,” says Frank Shank of the Joseph Bulova School, “stores don’t care whether the watch repair department makes money or not as long as it lures in people to look around.” Because visibility is so important, more retailers put their watchmakers up front. “People love to watch them work and talk to them like a doctor,” says David Aboulafia. “Seeing the work done before their eyes conveys a sense of immediate service. It also gives customers a living person to complain to.”

Demand exceeds supply: Oddly enough, surviving watchmakers may be on the verge of a financial boom precisely because so few are left…especially in rural areas. Martell R. Grover, a Rexburg, Idaho, jeweler, feels his in-house business will get better since “fewer and fewer stores have service departments.” Others note that though discount houses and department stores continue to gobble up watch sales, they offer poor, if any, service.

Nor are there enough trade shops to handle all available repair work. Adds an Amarillo, Tex., retailer, “Business is excellent. No one in town can repair quality watches except my watchmaker.” William DeSimone, a trade shop owner on Philadelphia’s Jewelers Row since 1956, insists his business “could’ve been five times bigger…but there are no qualified people around.” Laments Alice Carpenter, a watchmaking instructor at Wayne Community College, Goldsboro, N.C.: “We can fill dozens of jobs right now…there’s plenty of work, but people just aren’t going into it.” Carpenter, who’s also research and education chairwoman for the American Watchmakers Institute, concedes that “employers want experienced help…not students.”

To compensate for shortages of American personnel, bustling service centers like Philadelphia’s National Watch Repair have been hiring Vietnamese and Russian immigres. According to owner Arthur Odessey, “the Orientals are well trained and very eager to work.” Even so, Alice Carpenter views this practice as “undercutting” American watchmakers.

The law of supply and demand has pushed salaries up. In New York City, pay starts at about $250 per week, ranging to $450 or more for a highly skilled pro. Wages in New Jersey and Connecticut are 20% higher. According to Frank Shank, Michigan pays the best (“maybe because there aren’t many watchmakers up there”). But salaries–along with the cost of living–usually are lowest in rural areas.

There still are minimum-wage task masters everywhere who run “sweat shops” straight out of a Dickens novel. Dave Aboulafia claims that these “dinosaurs” don’t consider watchmakers trained craftsmen.

Unappreciative bosses are one big reason so many watchmakers end up opening their own shops. But these days, most talented newcomers want to go independent anyway since the rewards–financial and otherwise– are well-worth the risks. Competition is stiffest in Sunbelt states like Florida where concentrations of retired watchmakers keep their hand in to augment social security checks. But a talented, hard-working man willing to really service customers can earn better then $40,000 a year on his own.

The wrinkle is that it’s not as easy today to get a small business loan as 30 years ago. Yet newcomers game enough to dig up customers out of low-budget home basement shops can still do well. Many watchmaking school grads take a salaried factory, trade shop or retail store job, save up for a year or two, then strike out alone. Some jewelers, moreover, are willing to give (or rent) a watchmaker on-premises space and let him work as an independent shop.

Changing roles/attitudes: Watchmakers may still perform their timehonored duties in some stores, but a growing number have found their role changed or sharply curtailed. Sometimes this results from practical need (limited customers, space, time, etc.). Often, though, the jeweler has simply lost pride in his watch repair operation, viewing it as a nuisance task he has to provide.

One Stratford, Conn., jeweler says his watchmaker no longer does in-house overhauls. He’s more productive doing simple repairs, estimates, mailing, timing and sizing bands.

“My watchmaker is about to earn his Certified Gemologist title,” says Merritt Alenxander, a Hamburg, Pa., retailer. “He’s more valuable in the store selling than at the bench repairing.”

Where years ago a watchmaker did nearly everything connected with a repair job, many stores now have specialized personnel to handle mundane tasks like take-in, routing, parts ordering and delivery. This can benefit the busy watchmaker left to concentrate on what he does best–fix watches.

Schools in decline: That fewer and fewer people are entering the trade has become painfully evident to the 40-odd U.S. watchmaking schools. A recent study conducted by the American Watchmakers Institute reveals that at least half these schools have had recent enrollment problems. About 25% are suffering substantially below-average enrollment.

The Joseph Bulova School, for example, has incurred a 40% enrollment drop over the last five years. Once graduating 80-90 students a year, the school today turns out 20-25 new watchmakers annually.

Frank Shank isn’t sure why. “Watchmaking schools like ours are set up mainly for disabled people,” says Shank, noting that 80% of Bulova’s students are physically handicapped. “We offer the disabled an extraordinary opportunity…a chance to compete in the job market with anyone.”

Shank speculates that many, believing the field is dying, are being lured away by computer programming and myriad other high-tech fields similarly equipped to handle the wheelchair-bound. Meanwhile, thousands of potential watchmakers receive disability compensation and feel it just doesn’t pay to work…or fear losing benefits.

But watchmaking schools also have themselves to blame. Most cling to curricula and promotional practices as ancient as the art they teach. Though many students today prefer short-term programs, watch repair schools traditionally have required long-term training–some up to 36 months. What’s more, specialization–especially in mechanical watches–has failed to give graduates broad state-of-the-art skills.

public relations, however, is the area where watchmaking schools have fallen furthest behind the times. Resting on past glories, most budget a tenth the advertising funds to trade institutes in other fields.

Recent improvements: Belatedly, many schools have taken corrective measures. for the first time, Bulova this year is advertising for students, aiming at the millions of stay-at-home disabled who dream of self-supporting careers. Curricula, moreover, have been shortened. Cutting out non-essentials like lathework has reduced Bulova’s standard program from 13 to 9 months. In fact the demand for repair training far exceeds that for shop-oriented watchmaking, which before-long may disappear entirely. To diversify skills, schools like Bulova have stepped up instruction in electronic watch repair; soon quartz may comprise at least 25% of the curriculum.

“Mechanical training is still important,” stresses Aboulafia. “It provides exercise in dexterity and teaches you how to repair anything.” Long-negligent in building “people skills,” many schools, also have introduced courses in salesmanship and small business management.

In the end, watchmaking’s image problem–as well as its lack of new blood–will have to be corrected through a unified marketing, advertising and public relations push on the part of manufacturers, schools, associations–and jewelers.

“It will probably happen out of necessity,” predicts Dave Aboulafia. “Once factory service centers are overloaded and people can no longer get their watches fixed elsewhere, the money and resources will appear.”

Light, camera, action

A moving subject presents the photographer with a situation that requires quick thinking and plenty of preparation. Photographers don’t capture images of rapidly moving subjects such as lions chasing prey by merely reacting to what passes in front of their eyes. They come prepared for the confrontation and are able to anticipate the speed of the action and direction of travel.

Before you pick up your camera, you need to decide in advance whether to freeze the action with a fast shutter speed or emphasise the movement through techniques such as panning, slow-sync flash and time exposures. Your decision will depend largely on the subject and setting, as well as any technical limitations of your equipment.

One of the basics of photography is learning which shutter speed to choose with the lens in use in order to achieve a sharp image unaffected by the dreaded ‘camera shake’. There is an old rule of thumb for the 35-millimetre format that the minimum shutter speed selected should be the equivalent to the focal length of the lens in use, so 1/30sec for a 28-millimetre wide-angle lens, all the way up to 1/500sec for a 500-millimetre telephoto.

Although digital imaging means we can now work with a different range of focal lengths and with a greater choice of shutter speeds, the principle of this rule remains the same. Simply, the slower the shutter speed, the greater the chance of there being unwanted image blur or movement in your pictures. Unless, of course, you actually want to record such image blur. In that case, combining slow shutter speeds with panning proves most effective.

Action panning

Many wildlife and sports photographers use panning to depict a rapidly moving subject against a blurred background in order to convey the speed of the action and concentrate more of the viewer’s attention onto the subject. Panning is best executed when the camera locks focus on the subject and follows its path in a steady sweep, even after the shutter has fired. The camera’s autofocus needs to be set to continuous (predictive) AF mode and the shutter speed slow enough (1/60sec or less) to render the background as a streaky blur while the moving subject stays relatively sharp. This technique is effective with many wildlife images as well as sporting and cultural events.

The effect can be further accentuated by the use of flash. Most SLR cameras have a flash sync speed of 1/125sec or 1/250sec. (Remember, the flash sync speed is also the maximum shutter speed you should use with flash.) Using a slower shutter speed allows the scene to be recorded with the ambient light as well as the light from the flash. The effect of the ambient light on the scene, particularly the background, increases the longer the shutter stays open. If you’re close enough to the subject, the flash will help fill in any shadows and render a ghosting effect on moving parts.

When taking photos while panning, just focus on your subject–for example, a passing cyclist–and keep it within the frame, tracking its path across you. With your camera’s motordrive set to continuous, a burst of flash exposures with the shutter set at say 1/30sec will produce a well-lit foreground and focused target, but with a streaked background that helps emphasise the speed of the bicycle. By checking your results on the monitor you can determine if your choice of shutter speed was best for the desired effect.

Wildlife and water

Of course, not all subjects move as predictably as a passing cyclist. Wildlife, especially birds in flight, can be more unpredictable, and it pays to spend time observing the habits of your target. Knowing where a bird is likely to perch will help enormously in your attempts to photograph it in flight, as the instant before landing is when a bird’s flight is at its slowest.

Landscape photographers use shutter speeds of several seconds, even longer, when photographing scenes of moving water such as a waterfall or the sea rising and ebbing on the shoreline. Such slow shutter speeds (time exposures) create a soft and misty impression of water, erasing any defining lines of shape and depicting the surface as a study of muted colour. However, to be fully effective, the camera must be fixed on a tripod and the shutter released by a remote release or self-timer.

Freezing action

Freezing high-speed action requires a different approach. The quicker the subject, the faster the shutter speed required. Assuming there is enough light to ensure an accurate exposure, a shutter speed of 1/500sec will be adequate for most lenses and in most situations. Subjects such as F1 racing cars, skiers and other sports action will require something faster.

Stopping down the lens to its maximum aperture will give you the best chance of using the fastest possible shutter speed. Fast shutter speeds lessen the risk of camera shake, but some form of support, such as a tripod, is still advisable.

When photographing ball games, you will need to fire a continuous burst of frames to capture the moment when ball meets racquet, bat, boot or club. Even then, it will be mostly luck that determines if you’re successful.

Dos and don’ts of photographing moving subjects

Do …

* When panning, make sure to keep your camera moving evenly before, during and after firing the shutter

* Switch your camera’s autofocus mode to ‘continuous’ Many cameras now have a sophisticated ‘predictive’ algorithm that keeps up with changes of speed and direction as long as the subject is tracked

* Consider a monopod over a tripod. They are quicker to set up, keep your camera steady while panning and won’t get in anyone’s way

Don’t …

* Use a shutter speed faster than your camera’s flash sync speed if using flash. If you do, part of your image will be blacked-out by the shutter blind passing across the image sensor during exposure

* Forget to check the maximum range of your flash. Flash falls off quickly and less light may reach your subject than you think

* Just shoot from the hip, particularly when using long lenses. Always consider some means of support, even a beanbag on a ledge or car window sill

Equipment: lenses and cameras

Lens options: lenses to heat the shakes

Canon was the first manufacturer to develop special lens technology to counteract lateral and vertical movements caused by hand holding. Its range of image stabilising lenses make it possible to use slower shutter speeds for sharp results when using a camera and lens without a tripod. Nikon has a similar range of vibration reduction lenses, most recently applied to a 105-millimetre macro, while independent lens maker Sigma has developed an optical stabiliser lens range covering some telephoto focal lengths. While these lenses can’t substitute for the complete stability of a tripod, they can be a limited alternative in situations where a tripod is impractical.

Contacts: www.sigma-imaging-uk.com, www.canon.co.uk, www.nikon.co.uk

Digital option: Sony a100

Sony’s first interchangeable-lens digital SLR costs just 599 [pounds sterling] body only and is fully compatible with the Konica Minolta range of 35-millimetre and digital lenses. This camera features Super SteadyShot, a system that compensates for body vibrations at the instant the shutter is released by tilting the CCD image sensor in real time for sharper pictures. Because it is built into the camera, Super SteadyShot works with all Sony [alpha]-mount compatible lenses, thereby saving the need to buy into a specialist lens range.

Capturing star trails with a digital camera

Today’s digital SLR cameras and image-processing software are breathing new life into an old film-based technique.

Like many amateur astrophotographers who grew up using photographic film, I’ve been a bit reluctant to embrace the virtues of CCD imaging as a complete replacement for film. Sure, thermoelectrically cooled CCD cameras on telescopes play an important role at all levels of astronomy, but I’ve stubbornly (perhaps even a bit irrationally) held to the belief that some images can be obtained only by using good old-fashioned photographic emulsions.

One realm where I thought film would always reign supreme is in capturing star trails. One might ask why anyone would even consider taking something as simple and straightforward as star trails and adding the cost and complexity of digital photography to the mix. As I have recently discovered, however, it’s definitely worth the effort. The results presented in this article demonstrate the advantages of recording star trails digitally and show how this new realm of possibilities can breathe new life and creativity into your tired old star-trail photos.

Although I have to admit that working for Gemini Observatory with telescopes on Mauna Kea in Hawaii and Cerro Pachon in Chile gives me regular access to nearly perfect skies as backdrops, the technique described here can be adapted to urban sites as well. In fact, the improvements are even more dramatic in situations where light pollution or bright moonlight would prohibit shooting long-exposure star trails with film.

A Serendipitous Discovery

It all began one chilly night in early 2003 at the Gemini North Telescope, where two other astrophotographers and I were enjoying an evening of digital imaging. Our main purpose was to set up our Nikon D1x digital SLR (single-lens reflex) camera and to experiment with the possibility of creating a time-lapse movie of stars passing over Gemini’s dome from a sequence of 1-minute stills. Armed with an electronic timer, a portable power supply, cold-weather gear, and lots of hot chocolate, we began shooting images.

As often seems to happen when one experiments with new ideas and equipment, serendipity provided us with an opportunity to learn something new. In this case, the microdrive card that we were using could hold only 1 gigabyte of data. (A microdrive card is a miniature hard-disk drive that fits into the camera’s memory-card slot.) Every hour or so we bundled up and left the comfort of the observatory’s warm control room to stumble around in the darkness to replace the card. With time on our hands between downloading the cards’ contents, we experimented with the images we had obtained.

First we opened the individual images with Adobe Photoshop software and created an automated routine to subtract (remove) the electronic noise generated by the camera’s CCD detector using a dark frame. (A dark frame is an image of the same exposure duration and camera settings as the desired image, only with the camera lens covered.) This is done with Photoshop’s Difference blending mode, with the dark frame in one layer and the desired image in another. Each of these processed images was then flattened (combined) and saved and archived as a separate file on a CD.

After verifying that our image sequence would make a nice time-lapse movie, we began experimenting with a “stack” of images in Photoshop to see what other interesting things we could do. Inspiration struck one of our team members, Kevin Jones, when he began playing with the different blending-mode options used to combine the image layers. It turns out that the Lighten mode takes the selected image layer (the foreground) and compares its pixel values (in each color channel) with the underlying layer. If the foreground’s pixel values are the same as (or less than) the underlying layer, it leaves the resulting pixels unchanged. However, if the foreground’s values are higher (brighter), the Lighten mode uses the higher value of the two pixels in the composite. On the surface, this might not sound very profound, but the effect is that the sky brightness never increases beyond that present in the brightest single image. Meanwhile, the star images themselves continue to build up as the stars drift across the camera’s field.

The more images you add to the stack, the longer the resulting star trails. Since the sky brightness stays at a constant low level, the visual depth and contrast of a digital star-trail shot is more dramatic compared to a traditional long-exposure film photograph. (In the latter, the sky brightness accumulates during the entire exposure, reducing contrast between the stars and the background sky;)

Another advantage of the digital technique is that any foreground object that is illuminated will not become overexposed, as it would in a long-duration film exposure. This is especially important when you are attempting star trails with well lit foregrounds or under bright moonlight. Light pollution is also suppressed, allowing for dramatic star trails in relatively well lit areas that would otherwise quickly saturate film.

Tips and Pointers

For those wishing to try this technique, it is very helpful to use some sort of inter-valometer or timing circuit to automate the exposure times and intervals so you can leave the camera and not have to attend to each exposure.

It’s also important to keep pauses between exposures to a minimum (pauses will mean gaps in your star trails). With the Nikon D1x fitted with a 14-millimeter f/2.8 Nikkor lens, we were able to start the next exposure within about 1 to 2 seconds of the previous image–any longer than this and we would see a noticeable gap between exposures, even with such a short-focus lens. Most of our experiments were done centered on the equatorial region of the sky; the exposure gaps, however, were minimized when we shot circumpolar star fields.

Digital cameras differ in their ability to take long exposures, but detector noise is an issue with all digital cameras once exposures go beyond a second or two. To overcome this, some cameras have an automatic “noise-reduction” option, which might help, but could be unreliable depending upon the exposure time. For star-trail exposures I suggest disabling any of the camera’s built-in noise-reduction features and taking a dark frame. It’s a good idea to take a dark frame at the start and end of each session since the noise characteristics of a CCD or CMOS chip can change with temperature.

Use flash-memory or microdrive cards with the largest capacity that you can afford. Some cameras will allow you to switch cards while an exposure is being taken (but not while it is saving an image, of course) so you can keep a sequence going without missing a frame to change cards.

Experiment with different exposure times, white-balance and ISO settings, lens f/stops, and so forth. Each camera’s silicon detector is different, so plan on doing some preliminary tests first to find the best combination.

When you’re taking images, it’s always best to capture them in a noncompressed format such as TIFF. Make sure that the dark frames used have the same image format.

If you have a portable power supply, use it. Digital cameras require a lot of power when you’re using the bulb (time-exposure) setting, and, as the ambient temperature drops, the camera battery’s performance will also suffer.

Autofocus digital SLRs might have trouble focusing at infinity, so set the focus manually. If you use a manual-focus camera, notice where its infinity setting is located, as it’s often just inside the lens’s focus stop. Do some tests first to find the best focus.

With our setup, we obtained optimal results with 45- to 60-second exposures, but we also obtained good results with exposures up to 2 minutes long. Our 60-second shots recorded stars down to about 7th magnitude.

Image Processing

Once you have obtained all your exposures, transfer them to a computer with image-processing software. I use Photoshop 7.0 on a Macintosh G4 running under OS X, but I suspect other programs would work. The following instructions will be for Photoshop users:

1. Open the first image of your sequence and save it under a new name that you want to use for the final star-trail image.

2. Open the next image in your sequence. Use the Select > All command and copy this image (Edit > Copy).

3. Paste the copied image onto the first image–this is the beginning of the “stacking” process. You can now close the image that was copied to avoid confusion since you’re now done with that image.

4. Open the Layers palette (Window > Show Layers) and select the new layer created in the previous step.

5. Click on the Blend Mode menu in the Layers palette and select the Lighten mode. You should now see both images merged together as one.

6. Repeat steps 2 to 5 until you’re done with all images. You will probably want to flatten (under the Layer menu bar) your star-trail images periodically to save on disk space and memory in your computer. When you flatten an image all of your existing layers are merged into one and the file size becomes much smaller.

7. Once you’ve stacked and flattened all your images into a single one, you need to subtract the dark frame. To do this simply open the dark-frame image, click on Select > All, then copy the dark frame and paste it onto the star-trail image. At this point the image will go dark, so make sure that the new dark-frame layer is selected. Go to the Blend Mode menu again in the Layers palette and select the Difference mode. Now most of the noise on your image should be minimized, and you can flatten the image again and make final adjustments to it. Save the final image and you’re done!

Steps 2 to 6 can be tedious if you have a lot of images to stack. Photoshop has a very nice automation feature that can make processes like these much easier and quicker, so check your manual for detailed instructions on how to use it.

Exposure Gaps

Depending on your camera’s resolution, lens, and sky location, if you look closely you might notice small gaps between your stacked images. The reason for this is that at the end of each exposure, the pixels that are being exposed are not (on average) getting the full duration of exposure. Then, when the next exposure begins, these same pixels are still not getting the full exposure. Since the Lighten blending mode is not additive, when you stack the images the brightest single pixel is selected in the stack and, on average, at each gap it’s only 50 percent as bright as the adjacent area.

Shooting at less than full resolution (by binning, or combining, the pixels) will often cause the gaps to close up. Also, if you shoot the polar regions (or use a very short lens), the problem is not as evident since the overlap is so great.

If you find the gaps unacceptable, there are several Photoshop techniques that you can use to correct them. The technique I’ve found to be most effective is to simply duplicate the completed star-trail image, copy and paste it onto the original with Lighten mode, and shift and/or rotate it slightly to fill in the gaps. However, for viewing on a computer screen and for making small to medium prints, these tiny gaps should not be objectionable or, in most cases, even noticeable.

I’d be interested to hear from readers who might come up with a more clever (and more elegant) solution on how to minimize exposure gaps.

I also discovered in my tests that if you take the images (and the dark frame) without using the camera’s “sharpening” feature, the dark frame subtracts out much cleaner. If you use sharpening you will notice an annoying black ring around bright pixels that goes away when you turn off sharpening. However, if you don’t use internal sharpening in the camera, you might find it necessary to do it with Photoshop (under Filter) once the final image is stacked and flattened.

Our experiments were all done with a fairly high-end Nikon digital SLR camera, but I suspect that most other professional digital SLRs could be made to work as well. Overall, I’ve been impressed with the power of digital photography, achieving results that I had previously thought were possible only with film. While our technique does require fairly good equipment and significantly more effort in the processing stage, the results are nothing short of spectacular, and I look forward to seeing what others can accomplish using this technique.

What every musician should know about photography?

So your band is recording an album, and you’re starting to think about how you’re going to promote it to the industry and public. One of the key items you need to consider is decent photography. Musicians need photography to use on their CD cover/liner notes, and possibly more important, for promotion purposes. This photo is a representation of the artist or the band, making it necessary to put a lot of thought and creativity into it. Unfortunately, hiring a professional may not come cheap.

While speaking to four photographers from Halifax, Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver the prices vary for bandphotography, but the advice is similar.

When choosing a photographer, it is necessary to research what the photographer has done in the past and choose one that fits your budget. Bands that are signed under a major label have their photo shoots paid for by the label, enabling them a larger budget to work with. Independent bands have a more difficult time. When finding different prices for your band photography, make sure you know what is included in all the packages. Ask what it will cost for additional supplies such as contact sheets, film, processing, final prints, etc. Ask a photographer to explain clearly any procedures you don’t understand. As well, make sure you ask about photo credit. Many photographers keep the rights to the photos and want to be credited every time it is used. Like the rest of the music industry there is negotiation involved resulting in some form of an agreement.

Don Bird, a music consultant from Bird’s Word Productions Ltd., in Toronto, ON, suggests that if a band can’t afford a first rate photographer, then they should go to some of the art colleges and schools because there will be students who will have fresh ideas music wise.

John Leighton a photographer in Halifax, charges $100 an hour plus supplies. Leighton prefers that when a band comes to him for an album shot or promo picture, they have pre-planned what they want as a band. They should have an idea of what will work for them and decide on one member of the band to discuss with him what they want. “When I have six different band members coming to me and telling me different things, it gets frustrating.”

Johanne Mernmercier of Montreal, PQ. says, “I listen to the music to see what kind of mood they want. Sometimes they want photos from their live shows, in the studio or just outside. We just try to have fun. I think the artists should do research to see what has been done and find pictures of what they like.” Mernmercier charges $1,600-$1,800 for a one-day photo shoot. This does not include make-up artists, wardrobe or supplies. For a black and white Press Kit photo, she charges $300 and it belongs to the artist to do what he or she wants with it.

According to Jim Dawson of Fotowork in Toronto, ON, “if the portfolio looks good and the photographer is above board in explaining your options and his/her charges, then it’s a go.” Dawson’s prices are in the hundreds, “it all depends on the package,” he said. “Most clients are more interested in who you’ve photographed, more than what you’ve done with the people you’ve shot.” Musicians should focus more on the photographer’s style than who they’ve photographed before. Just because a photographer has shot some famous musicians doesn’t mean they’re going to be great for you or your band.

Photographer Ashely Maile from Vancouver, BC says, “I will cut a deal with an independent band and I hope they will help me along the way. It has happened that bands I have photographed, that are now signed, do help me out. My rates are less expensive for an indie band because they don’t have a lot of money and are not backed by a label.”

The band should be telling the photographer what they would be using the picture for. This will help the photographer understand what kind of photo is needed. “If you are looking for an album cover or design, then you should go for something darker, but if you’re just need an 8×10 glossy photo, you want it to be bright so it can reproduce really well. You have to picture it being reproduced in a little community newspaper or something like that,” says Maile.